When the search engine completed a massive expansion to their archives of Usenet newsgroups on December 11th, 2001, going back all the way to 1981, a wealth of vintage discussion from the early years of The Simpsons was unearthed. Usenet newsgroups, along with e-mail lists, pre-date the World Wide Web by over a decade and were the only forums for online discussion before the expansion of web-based discussion groups in the late 1990s. The Google search engine now allows for a fascinating look into the development of opinions and attitudes about "The Simpsons" starting from its earliest days. Here are links to 10 landmark Simpsons-related newsgroup posts including some of the earliest mentions of "The Simpsons" on the internet ever, early reviews of the show, and key moments in Simpsons action figure history:

July 24th, 1989 - First ever reference to "The Simpsons" on Usenet:

David Beckemeyer uses a quote from the Tracey Ullman shorts in his signature file on the newsgroup.

"I'll forgive you Dad... If you take a breath mint." Bart - "The Simpsons"

September 15th, 1989 - First ever reference to "The Simpsons" in the body of a post:

Jeff Meyer reviews "The Second Animation Celebration," a film collection of animated shorts which included some from The Tracey Ullman Show.

"THE SIMPSONS: Matt Groening of LIFE IN HELL produced about five short collections of cartoons featuring The Simpsons throughout the film. They're good -- dead spots exist, but most hit. They're not quite premieres, though -- I suspect these were originally shown on THE TRACY ULLMAN SHOW. But they're reliably funny, if a bit drab at points."

January 25th, 1990 - First ever reference to "The Simpsons" television series:

Rick Hillerich comments on "The Simpsons" in a post to

"And now for a comment and opinion of my own----The Simpsons is a great show but doesn't everyone think it starts out kind of depressing. For Example, the Christmas show they had no money,last week Homer had no job and was going to kill himself. I like the show a lot but find myself feeling sorry for the Simpsons rather than laughing at them."

January 25th, 1990 - First ever reference to "The Simpsons" in a subject title and the first ever multiple-post discussion thread about the show:

Brandon Freels writes, "I'm surprised no one has talked about this show yet. Has anyone else been following The Simpsons animated show Sunday night on FOX? I've been enjoying the show a great deal since it began. I enjoy the fact that there is now a prime-time animated show not just for kids being aired. I hope the idea continues, but it is probably just a fad."

Richard Bretscheider replies, "I agree. It's a nice balance between Matt's 'Hell' work and a prime time slot. Great animation. Great stereotyping of the kids."

Robert J Woodhead concludes the discussion with, "The Simpsons is a must-watch show. It's truly bent humor."

May 1st, 1990 - Oldest archived post on the newsgroup

Robert A. Granville writes about Simpsons T-shirts in what may be the inaugaural post on the first internet location specifically devoted to "The Simpsons,"

"I have seen two Homer Simpson t-shirts (I have one). On mine, Homer is saying 'Why you little...' and the caption underneath says 'All American Dad'."

May 10th, 1990 - First ever mention of Simpsons action figures:

Ryan D Mathews quotes a press release.

"LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- Toy industry giant Mattel announced an exclusive toy licensing agreement for the characters in the televison show 'The Simpsons'. The pact calls for a product line that will include Simpsons action figures, vehicles, play sets, dolls, preschool products and child-size accessories. The toys will be available in the fall and the other items next spring."

May 10th, 1990 - First ever complaint about Simpsons action figures:

Mark Delgrosso writes, "I read today in USA Today that Fox has sold Simpson's licensing rights to Mattel Inc. to manufacture a line of Simpsons actionn figures and playsets. I have one thing to say to Fox: You can't be serious...Why do people feel the need to totally commercialize every single new popular movie/show/person/product/etc. ? we have to go so far as to merchandise them to death?...there is such a thing a overkill. All I'm saying is that I hope the world doesn't go overboard with the Simpsons. It is dissapointing for those of us who appreciate something for what it is to see people exploiting it just because it's 'cool, man."'

November 27th, 1990 - First ever store sighting of Simpsons action figures:

Eric Salituro reports picking up "all 5" Mattel Simpsons action figures at K-Mart (perhaps including only the core family members but not Nelson or Bartman).

January 30th, 1992 - First Simpsons spin-off newsgroup launched:

Brian E. Saunders makes the inaugaural post to a new Simpsons spin-off newsgroup, (as well as the now defunct, launched simultaneously), marking perhaps the first point when a Simpsons supporting character became popular enough to earn its own location on the internet.

November 4th, 1992 - First ever "worst ever" for a Simpsons episode:

John R. Donald writes a savagely negative review of season 4's "Itchy & Scratchy: The Movie" and coins the infamous phrase "worst episode ever" in relation to a Simpsons episode, mentioning it not once but twice.

"I thought this was easily the worst episode ever. Simply not funny. 'Where did he put the firecracker?' I can't imagine child abuse being funny...Bart dropping his pants. How many times is this funny? Well, it was funny when we saw it in a previous episode. But I don't think that Bart's butt is inherintly funny...Bart as a stripper. Really more repulsive than funny. The bad thing about things like this is that I used to disagree with parents who didn't let their children watch the Simpsons - I no longer disagre with them...Star Trek...Now, the Simpsons have done it, and they didn't do it any better than anyone else. Should have left it alone, and come up with something original...Homer being very familiar with Chief Justices...Homer is simply not a bright guy. I can't believe he is that familiar with the names of the Supreme court justices...And I didn't like the bit about 40 years from now, although I don't really have an argument against it. I just didn't like it...This episode was an appeal to the lowest common denominator. It exploited cliches instead of exposing them. It twisted character traits in order to go after laughs. It relied on gimmicks that got a laugh in the past. It became a parody of itself. I repeat, this was by far the worst episode ever."

- Install the Akbar Font

Your continued use of this site is considered an agreement with our current privacy and usage policies.

Copyright © 2001-2009, Simpsons Collector Sector. All rights reserved. "The Simpsons" is a registered trademark of 20th Century Fox Film Corp. and "World of Springfield" is a registered trademark of Playmates Toys -- this website is in no way affiliated with either company or any other company whose products or services are represented here.

Can't see the menu? Try the site without styles

The browser you are using does not support the CSS stylesheet specifications used extensively in this site's design. This site will look much better (screenshot) in a browser that supports web standards, such as Internet Explorer 5.5+ or Netscape 6+, but it is accessible to any browser or Internet device. We recommend that you upgrade at your earliest convenience. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to email us.